Trump's Russia-Ukraine Deal - Here's Who Actually Profits
And here's who's footing the 10 trillion-dollar bill
Trump’s “peace” proposal reportedly includes not letting Ukraine join NATO, giving Putin most/all Ukrainian territories Russia has seized since 2014, along with half a trillion dollars in rare earth minerals from Ukraine as compensation for U.S. support.
But here’s what everyone misses:
The whole ploy is a scam by rich elites to fleece Western taxpayers.
Let’s look at the 4 players who stand to profit the most from selling out innocent civilians:
Vladimir Putin
The first and biggest winner is, of course, big daddy Vlad.
By “returning” the east of Ukraine to the Russian fold, hyper-competitive Enneagram 3w4 Putin gets the domestic glory he craves and lets him save face by winning a war that would’ve likely outlived him.
Plus he gets 19% of Ukraine — over 43,000 square miles (27 million acres), capturing a significant chunk of Ukraine’s railway network, power plants, pipelines, military bases, heavy industry, tons of anthracite coal, vital Black Sea ports on Crimea, and a big fat buffer zone with non-NATO Ukraine so Vlad can sleep 2% better at night.
Donald Trump
When all is revealed — in this life or the next — my hunch is that part of this deal wipes out whatever debts the President owes to any and all Russian creditors.
Plus, brokering this “peace” deal scores him mega-points with the mega-propagandized MAGA crowd. The brave hero who stopped the bloody war.
Watch out for a campaign to get him an undeserved Nobel Peace Prize (just like Obama’s.)
He might even finally get the go-ahead to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.
It also guarantees him support from the centa-billion-dollar American mining conglomerates that are chomping at the bit to gobble up Ukraine’s minerals.
Side note:
Ukraine already paid America.
It’s called the Budapest Memorandum.
Signed in 1994, Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for security assurances from the US, UK, and Russia.
Ukraine doesn’t owe the U.S. a dime — Trump is breaking a legal promise with an ally.
Ironically, Ukraine President Zelensky has intimated he’ll make a deal for minerals in exchange for U.S. security commitments, but considering Trump is an inveterate cheat who’s currently hopping into bed with Putin, one can only assume it’s Ukraine that’s about to get screwed.
Arms manufacturer shareholders
The second Trump announced America would be meeting with Russia without Ukraine at the table, French President Emmanual Macron called an emergency meeting of NATO.
Western leaders rushed to Paris on Monday and hammered out a commitment to, surprise surprise, increase military spending.
The UK’s right-wing Labour Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, even suggested he’d put British boots on the ground to make sure Russia doesn’t immediately renege after Trump’s deal goes through.
Opinion: All boots on the ground or increases in military spending beyond inflation should automatically trigger a national referendum.
Trump wants all NATO countries to boost military spending from 2% of GDP to a crushing 5% of GDP — the UK’s $36 billion increase would be more than they spend on education, transport, environment, science and innovation, housing, international aid, disability support, or child protection — and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has indicated that the new spending target will be “considerably more than 3 percent” of GDP.
Of course, you see the intrinsic stupidity of what Trump is saying: “I’m going to make peace, therefore, you should increase military spending.” It makes no sense to anyone — except the arms manufacturers who are guaranteed an extra half a trillion dollars annually.
Bank shareholders
Let’s never ever ever forget for a single moment that Emmanuel Macron is a Rothschild bankster.
While I was listening to the briefing on BBC today, my ears perked up when they casually mentioned that the European Commission *might* (will) trigger an emergency clause that would change the borrowing rules so countries could meet the new funding commitments.
That’s right:
Private banks will create money out of thin air and lend it to governments who will give it to arms manufacturers to make weapons to send to Ukraine for a war that will already be over.
Then you, dear taxpayer, will pay for it twice — once as inflation thanks to all that new money supply, and once as interest over the next thirty years.
Assuming this arrangement lasts for even ten years — and it could last a hundred — this whole package is going to cost us $10,000,000,000,000 at minimum.
For those keeping score, $10 trillion is enough to build houses for 200 million people.
Instead, your real wealth will go straight to the pockets of bank shareholders and weapon manufacturer shareholders.
For a war that is over.
In conclusion
First off: check your portfolios to ensure you don’t own any banking or arms manufacturers stocks or bonds. Otherwise, you’re knowingly complicit.
Secondly, it’s becoming more obvious by the day that the finance corporatocracy isn’t even pretending anymore.
The masks are off and they’re just transparently looting the people for private profit.
Russia has murdered 55,000 Ukrainian soldiers and civilians in the past three years. Putin has sacrificed 462,000–812,670 Russian sons. Western nations have piled their people with trillions in new debt. The shareholders of banks and weapons manufacturers have grown fat off the blood of the innocent.
We’re back to the waning days of the Roman Empire, friends.
Stand up. Speak up. Stop voting for establishment parties. Reject mammonomics. Plant good. Love your neighbor. Pray for peace.
Can't the Bank of England print the money instead of private banks? 🤔